Research-backed optimisation

Research-backed optimisation for complex energy planning.

Sympheny's optimisation engine is built on a decade of Empa and ETH Domain research in multi-energy system modelling: MILP optimisation, district heating layout, grid constraints, clustering, and decision-grade scenario comparison.

18
research publications
10+ yrs
Empa / ETH research lineage
10-100x
reported solve-time reduction

Sources include peer-reviewed journals, ETH and Empa repositories, open datasets, and published project applications. Claims on this page link to the underlying paper, dataset, or case evidence where available.

The short version

This is not a static calculator.

Sympheny is not a reporting layer on top of spreadsheets. It is an optimisation workflow for multi-carrier energy systems, built around published methods for modelling networks, technologies, storage, and hourly operation in one decision process.

Multi-energy optimisation

Sympheny is built on the energy-hub formulation: electricity, heat, cooling, gas, hydrogen, storage, and conversion technologies are modelled together instead of as disconnected calculations.

This is why the platform can size technologies, schedule operation, and compare cost, CO2, and self-sufficiency on one consistent model.

Network-aware planning

The research does not stop at choosing equipment. It includes district heating layout, thermal network losses, grid constraints, and interactions between buildings.

This is what makes Sympheny useful for districts, ports, campuses, utilities, and multi-owner energy communities.

Computational scaling

Peer-reviewed clustering and rolling-horizon methods reduce the computational burden of full-year, multi-building optimisation.

This is why planners can evaluate many more scenarios in the same project window, instead of reducing the problem until it fits a spreadsheet.

Decision-grade evidence

The same research line has been applied in real energy concepts, city-wide roadmaps, industrial sites, campuses, and policy-adjacent modelling.

This is what turns the science into practical planning evidence: lower risk before capital is committed, clearer trade-offs, and better investment confidence.

Concrete claims

What the research lets us say

These claims are deliberately specific: measurable, sourced, and tied to the decisions energy teams need to defend.

Structured
design workflow

Platform-based design gives complex energy systems a structured design workflow, inspired by advanced engineering industries, to manage complexity and reduce project risk.

Sulzer et al., Applied Energy 2023
Public
Zurich district dataset

The platform-based design paper includes a public Modelica/Sympheny district dataset, giving technical reviewers a concrete reference implementation instead of only a conceptual framework.

LBNL Simulation Research Group GitHub dataset
10-100x
faster computation

Published multi-scale and rolling-horizon methods reduce solve times enough to make detailed urban-scale optimisation practical.

Marquant et al., Applied Energy 2017; Procedia Computer Science 2015
40%
more renewables without grid upgrades

Grid-aware distributed energy optimisation can integrate substantially more renewables by coordinating system design and operation with electrical constraints.

Morvaj et al., Applied Energy 2016
18%
emissions reduction in operation

Including electrical grid constraints in operating schedules reduced emissions in the published test case while controlling voltage and current variation.

Morvaj et al., Applied Energy 2016
23%
lower emissions at same cost

A simultaneous MILP model for technology sizing, operation, and district-heating layout showed district heating could reduce emissions without increasing system cost in the case study.

Morvaj et al., Energy 2016
Open source
tool lineage

The Ehub Modeling Tool translated raw district data into executable optimisation code, establishing the software pattern behind today's product workflow.

Bollinger and Dorer, Energy Procedia 2017
5 tiers
security framework

Energy supply security can be quantified as a planning objective, helping teams evaluate resilience instead of treating it as a qualitative afterthought.

Sulzer et al., iScience 2025
4 cases
research-practice bridge

Applied case-study work showed that iterative stakeholder workflows, temporal decomposition, automation, and clear KPI visualisation are critical to bringing optimisation into real planning practice.

Bollinger, Marquant and Sulzer, IOP Conference Series 2019
Technical validation pack

Need to share the technical basis internally?

Download a concise source-linked pack with the key claims, research summaries, DOI links, open datasets, and access notes behind Sympheny's optimisation engine.

Download validation pack
Why it matters

Proof that supports technical and investment decisions

Technical confidence

Trust the model structure: the underlying methods are published and peer-reviewed, not hidden spreadsheet logic.

Model the real system: technologies, carriers, networks, storage, and hourly operation interact in one optimisation.

Explore more options: clustering and rolling-horizon methods make larger scenario sets practical.

Defend the recommendation: every scenario can be compared on cost, CO2, self-sufficiency, and network impact.

Investment confidence

Reduce investment risk before committing capital to infrastructure that will last decades.

Quantify trade-offs rather than picking a single vendor-led concept too early.

Find designs that improve carbon and cost together when the system allows it.

Give internal champions evidence they can take to budget holders, boards, and public stakeholders.

Key research

The papers behind the optimisation engine

These are the papers most useful for understanding why Sympheny's modelling approach is credible, inspectable, and practical for real planning work.

Platform-based design for energy systems

Matthias Sulzer, Michael Wetter, Robin Mutschler, Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli | Applied Energy, 2023

structured design energy hub digital workflow

Primary reference for the structured-design argument: energy systems need reusable, digital, multi-layer workflows because sector coupling and distributed resources make manual planning too complex. The paper includes a public Modelica/Sympheny district dataset.

Optimization-based planning of local energy systems - bridging the research-practice gap

Andrew Bollinger, Julien Marquant, Matthias Sulzer | IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019

practice gap automation KPI workflow

Foundational practice paper for Sympheny's product logic. It identifies iterative stakeholder workflows, temporal decomposition, automation, and KPI visualisation as the missing link between mature optimisation research and real planning adoption.

A holarchic approach for multi-scale distributed energy system optimisation

Julien Marquant, Andrew Bollinger, Ralph Evins, Jan Carmeliet | Applied Energy, 2017

MILP clustering multi-scale

Core scaling paper behind city and district optimisation. It connects building-level detail to larger district models and reports 10-100x computational speed improvements with minimal accuracy loss.

Reducing computation time with a rolling horizon approach

Julien Marquant, Ralph Evins, Jan Carmeliet | Procedia Computer Science, 2015

rolling horizon energy hub solve time

Shows how full-year operating strategy optimisation can be solved faster without relying only on typical-period shortcuts.

Optimising urban energy systems: simultaneous system sizing, operation and district heating network layout

Boran Morvaj, Ralph Evins, Jan Carmeliet | Energy, 2016

district heating network layout CO2/cost

Combines technology sizing, hourly operation, and district heating network layout in one optimisation model. The case study found a 23% emissions reduction at the same cost.

Optimization framework for distributed energy systems with integrated electrical grid constraints

Boran Morvaj, Ralph Evins, Jan Carmeliet | Applied Energy, 2016

grid constraints renewables distributed energy

Adds electrical grid constraints to distributed energy system optimisation, showing that grid-aware design and operation can reduce emissions and defer grid upgrades.

The Ehub Modeling Tool

Andrew Bollinger, Viktor Dorer | Energy Procedia, 2017

software automation energy hub

Open-source precursor showing how raw district descriptions can be translated into executable optimisation models and interpretable outputs.

Advancing the thermal network representation for optimal design

Danhong Wang, Xiang Li, Julien Marquant, Jan Carmeliet, Kristina Orehounig | Frontiers in Energy Research, 2021

thermal networks model validation MILP

Compares MILP thermal-network approximations with thermal-hydraulic simulation, clarifying where simplified optimisation is reliable and where extra constraints improve design quality.

A call to action for building energy system modelling in the age of decarbonization

Michael Wetter, Matthias Sulzer | Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2024

decarbonization workflow modelling

Explains why decarbonised, digitalised energy systems require a jump toward more holistic modelling, simulation, and optimisation workflows.

The energy supply security pyramid

Matthias Sulzer, Georgios Mavromatidis, Alejandro Nunez-Jimenez, Michael Wetter | iScience, 2025

energy security resilience policy

Turns energy supply security into a quantitative planning framework, useful for policy, resilience, and infrastructure investment decisions.

From research to field evidence

The science has been applied to real infrastructure decisions

Research proves the method. Projects prove that teams can use the method under real constraints: multiple owners, networks, tariffs, carbon targets, resilience requirements, and capital decisions.

DoD ICES

Joint Base Andrews - Thermal Network, USA

First DoD platform-based design application; thermal network design completed.

Field evidence for defense-grade installation energy planning and resilient thermal-network design, grounded in the same structured design and energy-hub logic described by Sulzer, Wetter, Mutschler, and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli.

Industrial ICES

Industrial Harbor Energy Community, Basel (IWB)

20-25% energy cost reduction across a multi-stakeholder industrial and utility site.

Closest analog to multi-owner port, industrial, and community energy systems where governance and infrastructure decisions overlap.

Commercial ICES

Net-Zero Commercial Park, Gossau, Switzerland

75% CO2 reduction and 20% lower lifecycle cost versus reference.

Strong cost-benefit benchmark for low-carbon commercial campus and district planning.

Campus microgrid

Energy Self-Sufficient Campus, Birr, Switzerland

Full self-sufficiency design using PV, hydrogen, biogas CHP, and batteries.

Validates islanding, seasonal storage, and hydrogen carrier logic in a practical planning workflow.

Heat network

Nanoverbund, Basel - Watt d'Or Prize 2025

Operational community thermal sharing network since 2023/24.

Field evidence for installation-community thermal coupling and shared local energy infrastructure.

Industrial ICES

Zurich Industrial Site Strategic Energy Plan

65% CO2 reduction at lifecycle cost parity.

Demonstrates multi-carrier planning across waste heat, heat pumps, PV, industrial loads, and cost constraints.

Industrial CCS

GEVAG Waste Incineration Plant, Trimmis (Graubünden)

54–65 CHF/tonne CO2 lifecycle cost. Amine washing optimal under high electricity-price scenarios.

Carbon-capture feasibility study — modelled energy flows (steam at 400 °C / 230 °C, hot water at 120 °C, electricity) and compared amine washing vs. hot potassium cycle. Sub-contracted by Empa. Tags: industrial · CCS · decarbonisation.

Bottom line

Sympheny helps teams make better energy infrastructure decisions because the optimisation method has already been stress-tested.

The commercial claim is simple: more credible scenarios, faster iteration, and clearer investment trade-offs for complex energy systems.