Research-backed optimisation for complex energy planning.
Sympheny's optimisation engine is built on a decade of Empa and ETH Domain research in multi-energy system modelling: MILP optimisation, district heating layout, grid constraints, clustering, and decision-grade scenario comparison.
Sources include peer-reviewed journals, ETH and Empa repositories, open datasets, and published project applications. Claims on this page link to the underlying paper, dataset, or case evidence where available.
This is not a static calculator.
Sympheny is not a reporting layer on top of spreadsheets. It is an optimisation workflow for multi-carrier energy systems, built around published methods for modelling networks, technologies, storage, and hourly operation in one decision process.
Multi-energy optimisation
Sympheny is built on the energy-hub formulation: electricity, heat, cooling, gas, hydrogen, storage, and conversion technologies are modelled together instead of as disconnected calculations.
This is why the platform can size technologies, schedule operation, and compare cost, CO2, and self-sufficiency on one consistent model.
Network-aware planning
The research does not stop at choosing equipment. It includes district heating layout, thermal network losses, grid constraints, and interactions between buildings.
This is what makes Sympheny useful for districts, ports, campuses, utilities, and multi-owner energy communities.
Computational scaling
Peer-reviewed clustering and rolling-horizon methods reduce the computational burden of full-year, multi-building optimisation.
This is why planners can evaluate many more scenarios in the same project window, instead of reducing the problem until it fits a spreadsheet.
Decision-grade evidence
The same research line has been applied in real energy concepts, city-wide roadmaps, industrial sites, campuses, and policy-adjacent modelling.
This is what turns the science into practical planning evidence: lower risk before capital is committed, clearer trade-offs, and better investment confidence.
Proof that supports technical and investment decisions
Technical confidence
Trust the model structure: the underlying methods are published and peer-reviewed, not hidden spreadsheet logic.
Model the real system: technologies, carriers, networks, storage, and hourly operation interact in one optimisation.
Explore more options: clustering and rolling-horizon methods make larger scenario sets practical.
Defend the recommendation: every scenario can be compared on cost, CO2, self-sufficiency, and network impact.
Investment confidence
Reduce investment risk before committing capital to infrastructure that will last decades.
Quantify trade-offs rather than picking a single vendor-led concept too early.
Find designs that improve carbon and cost together when the system allows it.
Give internal champions evidence they can take to budget holders, boards, and public stakeholders.
The science has been applied to real infrastructure decisions
Research proves the method. Projects prove that teams can use the method under real constraints: multiple owners, networks, tariffs, carbon targets, resilience requirements, and capital decisions.
Joint Base Andrews - Thermal Network, USA
First DoD platform-based design application; thermal network design completed.
Field evidence for defense-grade installation energy planning and resilient thermal-network design, grounded in the same structured design and energy-hub logic described by Sulzer, Wetter, Mutschler, and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli.
Industrial Harbor Energy Community, Basel (IWB)
20-25% energy cost reduction across a multi-stakeholder industrial and utility site.
Closest analog to multi-owner port, industrial, and community energy systems where governance and infrastructure decisions overlap.
Net-Zero Commercial Park, Gossau, Switzerland
75% CO2 reduction and 20% lower lifecycle cost versus reference.
Strong cost-benefit benchmark for low-carbon commercial campus and district planning.
Energy Self-Sufficient Campus, Birr, Switzerland
Full self-sufficiency design using PV, hydrogen, biogas CHP, and batteries.
Validates islanding, seasonal storage, and hydrogen carrier logic in a practical planning workflow.
Nanoverbund, Basel - Watt d'Or Prize 2025
Operational community thermal sharing network since 2023/24.
Field evidence for installation-community thermal coupling and shared local energy infrastructure.
Zurich Industrial Site Strategic Energy Plan
65% CO2 reduction at lifecycle cost parity.
Demonstrates multi-carrier planning across waste heat, heat pumps, PV, industrial loads, and cost constraints.
GEVAG Waste Incineration Plant, Trimmis (Graubünden)
54–65 CHF/tonne CO2 lifecycle cost. Amine washing optimal under high electricity-price scenarios.
Carbon-capture feasibility study — modelled energy flows (steam at 400 °C / 230 °C, hot water at 120 °C, electricity) and compared amine washing vs. hot potassium cycle. Sub-contracted by Empa. Tags: industrial · CCS · decarbonisation.
Sympheny helps teams make better energy infrastructure decisions because the optimisation method has already been stress-tested.
The commercial claim is simple: more credible scenarios, faster iteration, and clearer investment trade-offs for complex energy systems.