Own the energy roadmap your council, residents, and Energiestadt assessors can stand behind.

Net-zero 2050, cantonal Energiestrategie revisions, Energiestadt re-certification, and räumliche Energieplanung obligations all land on the same small team. Sympheny gives municipalities and public-sector planners one model to compare district and city-level pathways, defend the recommendation to council and residents, and re-run scenarios as policy and budgets evolve — without re-commissioning the study.

In a 30 minute demo, see your project set up, scenarios compared, and a report ready to share.

Sympheny monthly energy flow chart aggregating supply and demand by month across a full planning horizon

Monthly energy flow — supply and demand aggregated month-by-month across the planning horizon.

USED BY MUNICIPAL AND PUBLIC ENERGY TEAMS AT

Trusted by municipal and public energy teams

Used by Swiss cities and public energy planners to deliver räumliche Energieplanung, Energiestadt deliverables, and long-horizon decarbonisation roadmaps.

EWB (City of Bern)Ville d'Yverdon-les-BainsIBC ChurEicher+PauliSIG Geneva

How Sympheny helps

From targets to a defensible pathway

Move from net-zero ambition to concrete district and city-level supply scenarios with cost, CO₂, and feasibility trade-offs the council can compare.

Built for political and public scrutiny

Sankey, Pareto and dashboard outputs make the trade-offs visible for committees, residents and assessors — so the recommendation holds up in the room, not just on paper.

A planning asset the city owns

The model stays with your team. Re-run scenarios as cantonal rules, energy prices, or development plans change — without going back to a consultant for every revision.

What changes for municipal energy teams

From targets to pathways
Before
Net-zero and Energiestadt targets are set, but the concrete routes to hit them are hard to compare side by side
After
Scenarios link targets to defensible district and city-level supply pathways with visible trade-offs
Council and resident-facing reviews
Before
Technical assumptions are hard to explain to non-specialists — the recommendation lives or dies in the meeting
After
Sankey and Pareto outputs make cost, CO₂ and feasibility trade-offs easy to discuss in council and at public consultations
Re-certification and revision cycles
Before
Each new policy, price update, or development plan triggers a new external study
After
Update assumptions in the model your team owns and re-run scenarios in days, not months
Consultant relationship
Before
Eight-month studies, six-figure invoices, and a static PDF that's outdated on delivery
After
Consultants can work inside the same model — the deliverable is a planning asset the city keeps

For municipalities, defensible scenarios matter.

“Sympheny supports our strategic energy planning in an ideal way. The flexibility is extremely convincing and the sensitivity analysis provides security in finding solutions.”

— Andreas Wirz, CEO, Eicher+Pauli Read the full Yverdon-les-Bains case study →

See how it fits projects like yours.

In a 30 minute demo, see your project set up, scenarios compared, and a report ready to share.