Deliver more energy concepts per engineer — without dropping the rigour clients expect.

Energy concepts are now a high-volume part of the workload, and clients expect more scenarios with defensible assumptions. Sympheny helps engineering and consulting firms scale that output without scaling senior engineering headcount — the optimiser handles scenario preparation so your team focuses on the judgement clients pay for.

In a 30 minute demo, see your project set up, scenarios compared, and a report ready to share.

Sympheny detailed Sankey energy-flow diagram tracing electricity, ambient heat, heat pump, battery and hot water storage to electricity and space-heating demand on a multi-energy hub

Detailed Sankey energy flow — every carrier, technology, and storage element traced from supply to demand.

USED BY ENGINEERING TEAMS AT

Trusted by consulting engineering teams

Used by engineering consultancies on energy concept, feasibility, and Areal planning projects across Switzerland and beyond.

Amstein+WalthertEicher+PauliBuro HappoldGrunerBG IngénieursEmpa

How Sympheny helps

Free up senior engineering capacity

Move from project inputs to scenario setup without rebuilding spreadsheets. The hours saved are hours your team can put on the next project.

More scenarios, defensible recommendations

Compare cost, CO₂, technology sizing and trade-offs on a Pareto Front — and stress-test the chosen direction across price, demand, and policy sensitivities.

Outputs your client (and their CFO) can read

Sankey, Pareto and dashboard outputs come straight from the model. No rebuilding charts in slide decks before a steering committee.

What changes for engineering teams

Project setup
Before
Each assignment starts with a fresh spreadsheet rebuild — senior engineers tied up on data prep instead of analysis
After
Structured inputs and reusable workflows — your team starts every project from a working baseline, not a blank tab
Scenario comparison
Before
Two or three scenarios per project because each change is a manual rework
After
Pareto comparison across cost, CO₂ and technical constraints — including the sensitivity runs that make the recommendation defensible
Client delivery
Before
Results translated by hand into slides and PDFs before every committee
After
Sankey, Pareto and dashboard outputs viewable in-app and printable from the same workflow
Team capacity
Before
Adding more projects means hiring more senior engineers — a 12-month problem
After
Same team takes on more energy-concept work without dropping the standard clients expect

For engineering teams, defensible recommendations matter.

“Sympheny supports our strategic energy planning in an ideal way. The flexibility is extremely convincing and the sensitivity analysis provides security in finding solutions.”

— Andreas Wirz, CEO, Eicher+Pauli Read the full Insel-Holligen case study →

See how it fits projects like yours.

In a 30 minute demo, see your project set up, scenarios compared, and a report ready to share.